「一中原則」成了習近平的「國王舊衣」

川普周末上福斯電視台，表態「他不想讓中國命令他要不要接台灣的電話」，再度質疑「除非我們和中國能在其他事情（中國在匯率、北韓或南海問題上不跟美國合作），像是貿易上達成協議，我不知道為什麼必須要受到『一個中國』政策約束」（請見以下原文），這些都是先前他在Twitter已經提過。但顯然地，支那這十天來，除了用黨媒不斷放話及要求歐巴馬向川普施壓之外，並沒有開始跟川普團隊接觸，更不用說對這些問題，與川普有任何溝通。

川普原文：

I fully understand the ‘one China’ policy, but I don’t know why we have to be bound by a ‘one China’ policy unless we make a deal with China having to do with other things, including trade,

I mean, look, we’re being hurt very badly by China with devaluation, with taxing us heavy at the borders when we don’t tax them, with building a massive fortress in the middle of the South China Sea, which they shouldn’t be doing, and frankly with not helping us at all with North Korea,

You have North Korea. You have nuclear weapons, and China could solve that problem, and they’re not helping us at all,

我們都知道，支那的「一中原則（one China Principle）」與美國的「一中政策（one China Policy）」有所不同：

The One-China policy refers to the policy or view that there is only one state called "China", despite the existence of two governments that claim to be "China". As a policy, this means that countries seeking diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China (PRC, Mainland China) must break official relations with the Republic of China (ROC, Taiwan) and vice versa.

The One China policy is also different from the "One China principle", which is the principle that insists both Taiwan and mainland China are inalienable parts of a single "China".

2009年11月24日，當時的美國在台協會主席薄瑞光即在圓桌會議對媒體闡明，我能肯定美國在北京私下和公開發表的聲明，包括《美中聯合聲明》，不代表美國對台灣主權的立場有任何改變。美國對台灣地位的立場，包含在美國與中國從1972年到1979年簽署的《聯合公報》之中，在公報中聲明了美國「認知中國的立場，即只有一個中國，台灣是中國的一部分」。這也是美國最後一次對於台灣的地位發表聲明。過去三十七年來，美國明白表示「認知」不代表認可、不代表接受，除了「認知」以外不代表任何意義。

但美英兩國的主流媒體顯然完全將兩者混淆，這是蔡英文政府自己要去釐清的，川普的出現是歷史的機遇，讓我們現在有再一次的機會來得及更正與補救，舉例如下：

Fox: President-elect Donald Trump again signaled Sunday a willingness to confront Beijing, questioning whether the United States should keep its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of “one China.”

Reuters: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump said the United States did not necessarily have to stick to its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of "one China,"

CNN: President-elect Donald Trump again signaled Sunday a willingness to confront Beijing, questioning whether the United States should keep its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of "one China."

VOA: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump questioned Sunday whether the United States should continue its "one China" policy that includes its Taiwan province, unless Beijing offers concessions on trade and other issues.

New York Times: Mr. Trump, speaking on Fox News, said he understood the principle of a single China that includes Taiwan.

CNBC: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump said the United States did not necessarily have to stick to its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of "one China."

the Huffington post: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump questioned whether the United States had to be bound by its longstanding position that Taiwan is part of “one China.”

Business Insider: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump questioned whether the United States had to be bound by its longstanding position that Taiwan is part of "one China."

Fortune: U.S. President-elect Donald Trump questioned whether the United States had to be bound by its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of “one China.”

Zerohedge: the President-elect questioned whether the United States had to be bound by its long-standing position that Taiwan is part of "one China."

Guardian: the president-elect said he saw no reason why the US should continuing abiding by the “One China” policy – by which Taiwan is officially considered part of the same single Chinese nation as the mainland.

Telegraph: The One China policy is the recognition in the US of the long-held position in Beijing that there is only one China, and Taiwan is part of that.

Australia news: Trump said he understood the long-standing US position that Taiwan was part of China.

支那一再強調，中美關係的核心是台灣，川普卻直接把牌亮出來，用台灣來「勒索」支那；也就是說，以後只要不配合美國的利益 (在貿易、南海、匯率、北韓......等等問題上) ，支那就無法維持「一中原則」。川普同時也證實了一個殘酷的事實，美國早在1979年就將台灣賣給支那了，但當初卻留了一個「台灣關係法」與「六項保證」的尾巴，如今得以運用、把台灣再當做與支那談判及交易的籌碼。

川普要求的代價，中共現在不一定付得起，也一定不想付。可是，我們可以看到支那「遇強不回」的「色厲內荏」態度之具體呈現：一、叫囂要台灣為這十二分鐘通話付出代價；二、自稱「中國肥羊」，卻要川普休想「割肉」（請見以下擷圖）。彷彿為了37年來、獲得的既得利益，「一中原則」也不是不可拋棄。